Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest

Print / Save PDF

Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage (Adaptive Security (TeamGuard AI Inc.)) and SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) (SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage	SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
Vendor	Adaptive Security (TeamGuard AI Inc.)	SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))
HQ	United States · North America	Germany · Europe
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security, Code security
Summary	API-based 'agentic email security' that re-analyses inbound mail after native filtering with ML and LLM reasoning and removes confirmed threats across every inbox automatically (configurable human-in-the-loop thresholds). AI Phish Triage classifies employee-reported emails and acts on them, feeding Adaptive's simulations and awareness training.	German autonomous pentesting product for web apps and APIs: given a target URL, scope and optional source code, its AI agents carry out real exploitation, a separate agent re-tests every finding against the live app to weed out false positives, and a compliance-ready report with proof-of-exploit and remediation steps arrives within 24 hours; continuous monthly runs mark findings fixed, regressed or new.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	ISO 27001, SOC 2
Capabilities / tasks	email security, phishing triage, remediation, threat detection	pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management, attack surface
Pricing (as published)	Not published (per-seat quote based on employee count and products)	Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan.
Pricing model	quote	published-tiers
Primary source	https://www.adaptivesecurity.com/email-security	https://squr.ai/
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-20
Official site	https://www.adaptivesecurity.com/email-security	https://squr.ai/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage and SQUR Autonomous Pentest?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage-only tasks: email-security, phishing-triage, remediation, threat-detection. SQUR Autonomous Pentest-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec, vulnerability-management, attack-surface. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage: Not published (per-seat quote based on employee count and products) SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification): Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan.

Where are Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage and SQUR Autonomous Pentest headquartered?

Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage publishes HQ in United States. SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) publishes HQ in Germany.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage or SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

• Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

Related

• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage alternatives
• SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) alternatives
• Best security AI agents

More Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)

More SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
• Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
• Anomali Agentic AI in ThreatStream Next-Gen and the Anomali Data Lake (autonomous triage, scoring and investigation agents) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)