AIpentix vs Material Security AI agents
Quick answer
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) (Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH)) and Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) (Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH)) and Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) is tagged for DORA.
| Field |  AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) |  Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Swipergy (Swipergy GmbH) | Material Security |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | German continuous security-testing platform with an AI agent that signs in to the customer's application on its own, chooses follow-up checks and documents attack paths, with every tool run evidenced. Findings are grouped into remediation actions with owners, deadlines and Jira sync, and retests confirm fixes. Agentic red-team campaigns (recon, access, lateral and report agents led by human red teamers) are also offered for TIBER-EU and DORA TLPT style testing. | Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | DORA | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | DORA TLPT, TIBER-EU | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, vulnerability management, remediation | phishing triage, email security, remediation, incident response, cloud security |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.aipentix.com/en/ | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aipentix.com/en/ | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between AIpentix and Material Security AI agents?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: remediation. AIpentix-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, vulnerability-management. Material Security AI agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, incident-response, cloud-security. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy): Not published Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent): Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote.
Where are AIpentix and Material Security AI agents headquartered?
AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) publishes HQ in Germany. Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) or Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) alternatives
- Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) comparisons
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- 7AI agentic security platform vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
More Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)