Amnify security agents vs Escape

Print / Save PDF

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) (Amnify (Amnify GmbH)) and Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)	Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
Vendor	Amnify (Amnify GmbH)	Escape
HQ	Germany · Europe	France · Europe
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.	Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	—
Capabilities / tasks	appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, pr review, remediation, pen test management, cloud security	appsec, pen test management, attack surface
Pricing (as published)	Published credit-based plans (amnify.ai/pricing, checked 2026-10-21): Free €0 (30 credits, 7 days, 1 repo, 1 cloud account); Starter €192/month (200 credits, 10 repos); Team €460/month (500 credits, 50 repos, 3 cloud accounts); Business €880/month; Enterprise on request. Extra credits €1 each. Each review, audit or pentest costs credits; no per-seat fees.	Quote-based
Pricing model	freemium	quote
Primary source	https://amnify.ai/	https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/
Last checked	2026-10-21	2026-10-18
Official site	https://amnify.ai/	https://escape.tech/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Amnify security agents and Escape?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pen-test-management. Amnify security agents-only tasks: sast, sca, secrets-detection, iac, pr-review, remediation, cloud-security. Escape-only tasks: attack-surface. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests): Published credit-based plans (amnify.ai/pricing, checked 2026-10-21): Free €0 (30 credits, 7 days, 1 repo, 1 cloud account); Starter €192/month (200 credits, 10 repos); Team €460/month (500 credits, 50 repos, 3 cloud accounts); Business €880/month; Enterprise on request. Extra credits €1 each. Each review, audit or pentest costs credits; no per-seat fees. Escape (AI pentesting and DAST): Quote-based

Where are Amnify security agents and Escape headquartered?

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) publishes HQ in Germany. Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) publishes HQ in France.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) or Escape (AI pentesting and DAST). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.

Use-case comparisons

• AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

Related

• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) alternatives
• Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) alternatives
• Best code security AI agents

More Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) comparisons

• Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
• AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Checkmarx One Assist

More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons

• Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
• Checkmarx One Assist vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)