Attic IVON vs Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation
Quick answer
Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) (Attic Security) and Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability) (Check Point Software Technologies) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) (Attic Security) and Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability) (Check Point Software Technologies) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) |  Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Attic Security | Check Point Software Technologies |
| HQ | Netherlands · Europe | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Dutch AI SOC agent for Microsoft 365 SMBs that triages, investigates and contains identity alerts across Defender, Sentinel and Entra ID with human sign-off. | Part of Check Point Exposure Management, launched May 28, 2026. AI agents reason like attackers across an organisation's external attack surface, correlating exposures, leaked credentials, CVE and live exploit research with existing protection coverage, then safely prove, pivot on, or discard each finding, so teams get evidence of what is actually exploitable. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | security operations, alert triage, incident response, threat detection, remediation | attack surface, exposure management, pen test management, vulnerability management, threat intelligence |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: the agentic MDR page lists €6 per user per month, decreasing with more users. The pricing page lists plans from €27/month on annual billing, with incident-handling add-ons (+2x IVON incident handling from €30.15, +5x from €34.20). Prices exclude VAT. Check the pricing page for current amounts. | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://atticsecurity.com/en/agentic-mdr/ | https://www.checkpoint.com/solutions/agentic-exposure-validation/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://atticsecurity.com/en/agentic-mdr/ | https://www.checkpoint.com/solutions/agentic-exposure-validation/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Attic IVON and Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Attic IVON-only tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, incident-response, threat-detection, remediation. Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation-only tasks: attack-surface, exposure-management, pen-test-management, vulnerability-management, threat-intelligence. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365): Published: the agentic MDR page lists €6 per user per month, decreasing with more users. The pricing page lists plans from €27/month on annual billing, with incident-handling add-ons (+2x IVON incident handling from €30.15, +5x from €34.20). Prices exclude VAT. Check the pricing page for current amounts. Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability): Not published
Where are Attic IVON and Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation headquartered?
Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) publishes HQ in Netherlands. Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability) publishes HQ in Israel.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) or Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
- Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) alternatives
- Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Attic IVON (Agentic MDR for Microsoft 365)
More Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation (AEV, AI agents that prove external exploitability)