Beelzebub Arcangelo vs Maze AI Agents
Quick answer
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) (Beelzebub (Beelzebub S.r.l.)) and Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) (Maze) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) (Beelzebub (Beelzebub S.r.l.)) and Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) (Maze) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) |  Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Beelzebub (Beelzebub S.r.l.) | Maze |
| HQ | Italy · Europe | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Italian AI-native offensive platform product: Arcangelo continuously maps internal and external attack surfaces, then runs adaptive multi-stage agentic penetration tests that plan and pivot like an attacker, with potentially intrusive exploitation kept human-approved and auditable. | UK AI agents that investigate every cloud and code vulnerability with code-to-cloud context, decide exploitability and deliver fixes. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, threat intelligence | cloud security, vulnerability management, remediation, sca, sast |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published. |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://beelzebub.ai/products/arcangelo/ | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://beelzebub.ai/products/arcangelo/ | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Beelzebub Arcangelo and Maze AI Agents?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Beelzebub Arcangelo-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, threat-intelligence. Maze AI Agents-only tasks: cloud-security, vulnerability-management, remediation, sca, sast. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing): Not published Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code): Not published.
Where are Beelzebub Arcangelo and Maze AI Agents headquartered?
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) publishes HQ in Italy. Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) publishes HQ in United Kingdom.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) or Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Cloud security (CNAPP) AI agents — 9 listings (Cloud and container security posture, exposure and remediation)
Related
- Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) alternatives
- Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
More Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)