Beelzebub Arcangelo vs Upwind AI Agentic Pack
Quick answer
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) (Beelzebub (Beelzebub S.r.l.)) and Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents) (Upwind) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) (Beelzebub (Beelzebub S.r.l.)) and Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents) (Upwind) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Beelzebub (Beelzebub S.r.l.) | Upwind |
| HQ | Italy · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Italian AI-native offensive platform product: Arcangelo continuously maps internal and external attack surfaces, then runs adaptive multi-stage agentic penetration tests that plan and pivot like an attacker, with potentially intrusive exploitation kept human-approved and auditable. | Specialised AI agents inside Upwind's runtime-first cloud security platform: Blue investigates threats to a verdict, Red proves which risks are exploitable, Green finds root-cause fixes and opens PRs, coordinated by Choppy. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, threat intelligence | cloud security, incident response, exposure management, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://beelzebub.ai/products/arcangelo/ | https://www.upwind.io/agentic-security |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://beelzebub.ai/products/arcangelo/ | https://www.upwind.io/agentic-security |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Beelzebub Arcangelo and Upwind AI Agentic Pack?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: exposure-management. Beelzebub Arcangelo-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, threat-intelligence. Upwind AI Agentic Pack-only tasks: cloud-security, incident-response, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing): Not published Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents): Not published
Where are Beelzebub Arcangelo and Upwind AI Agentic Pack headquartered?
Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) publishes HQ in Italy. Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) or Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Cloud security (CNAPP) AI agents — 9 listings (Cloud and container security posture, exposure and remediation)
Related
- Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) alternatives
- Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Beelzebub Arcangelo (IASM/EASM with agentic penetration testing)
More Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Upwind AI Agentic Pack (Choppy, Blue, Red and Green agents)