CITSmart GRC.S vs episki Autonomous GRC
Quick answer
CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) (Central IT (CITSmart)) and episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) (Central IT (CITSmart)) and episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) is tagged for ISO 27001, HIPAA.
| Field |  CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) |  episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Central IT (CITSmart) | episki (episki, llc) |
| HQ | Brazil · Latin America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance, Security | Compliance, Risk |
| Summary | Brazilian GRC-plus-security-operations platform from Central IT: alerts from proxy, DNS, XDR, e-mail and identity tools are correlated and prioritised by AI, AI agents check deadlines, priorities and owners for each compliance or security demand, and AI agents execute checks and response actions in the environment (Cognitive Workflow), with LGPD, ISO 27001, NIST, CIS Controls 8 and ISO 42001 mapped out of the box. | A GRC platform built around agents that draft policies, answer inbound security questionnaires, review vendors' SOC 2 and CAIQ responses, map controls, assess risks and write deterministic evidence-collection recipes. Every plan, step-run and sensitive action goes through human approvals and safety floors. Pricing is published. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | ISO 27001, HIPAA | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | LGPD, HIPAA, CCPA, ISO 27001, ISO 27002, NIST, CIS Controls 8, ISO 42001, PPSI, PSEC PJ | SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CMMC, HIPAA, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act |
| Capabilities / tasks | compliance workflows, control monitoring, alert triage, incident response, risk assessment, remediation | policy management, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, evidence collection, control mapping, risk assessment, trust center |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.centralit.com.br/produtos/gestao-de-riscos-e-compliance | https://episki.com/product/ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://www.centralit.com.br/produtos/gestao-de-riscos-e-compliance | https://episki.com/product/ai |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CITSmart GRC.S and episki Autonomous GRC?
Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: risk-assessment. CITSmart GRC.S-only tasks: compliance-workflows, control-monitoring, alert-triage, incident-response, remediation. episki Autonomous GRC-only tasks: policy-management, questionnaire-automation, vendor-risk, evidence-collection, control-mapping, trust-center. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions): Not published episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence): Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited.
Where are CITSmart GRC.S and episki Autonomous GRC headquartered?
CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) publishes HQ in Brazil. episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) or episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
Related
- CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) alternatives
- episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) alternatives
- Best compliance AI agents
More CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions)
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions)
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions)
- CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) vs Comp AI
- CITSmart GRC.S (GRC + SecOps platform with AI agents that check deadlines and execute response actions) vs Complyance GRC AI Agents
More episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)