Cloudgeni cloud agents vs noze CyberAgent

Quick answer

Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents) (Cloudgeni (Cloudgeni AS)) and noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents) (Cloudgeni (Cloudgeni AS)) and noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents) is tagged for DORA.

Columns

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents)noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
Vendor Cloudgeni (Cloudgeni AS)noze (noze S.r.l.)
HQ Norway · EuropeItaly · Europe
Primary category SecuritySecurity
Also listed in Security, ComplianceSecurity, Compliance
Summary Oslo-built agentic cloud operations platform whose agents find cloud security and compliance issues, investigate across cloud state and IaC, write the Terraform/Bicep fix, validate it with a plan and policy checks and open a pull request, then verify the fix after it lands. The Compliance Remediation Agent works from Prowler, Security Hub, Defender and Checkov findings against CIS, SOC 2, ISO 27001 and NIS2. Autonomy is set by policy.Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Frameworks (vendor-stated) DORA—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed) CIS Benchmarks, SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORANIS2, DORA, ISO 27001
Capabilities / tasks cloud security, remediation, iac, compliance posture, pr review, policy as codeattack surface, vulnerability management, pen test management, risk prioritization, evidence collection
Pricing (as published) Published tiers on cloudgeni.ai/pricing: Free ($0, 1 cloud account, 2 repos, 50 agent actions/month, DevOps Agent only); Pro $79 per user/month (Remediation, Drift, Import, DevOps and PR Review agents; CIS, SOC 2, ISO 27001); Enterprise custom (all agents, DORA/HIPAA/PCI-DSS frameworks, SSO, self-hosting options). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page.From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published.
Pricing model freemiumpublished-tiers
Primary source https://cloudgeni.ai/https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/
Last checked 2026-10-192026-10-21
Official site https://cloudgeni.ai/https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Cloudgeni cloud agents and noze CyberAgent?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Cloudgeni cloud agents-only tasks: cloud-security, remediation, iac, compliance-posture, pr-review, policy-as-code. noze CyberAgent-only tasks: attack-surface, vulnerability-management, pen-test-management, risk-prioritization, evidence-collection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents): Published tiers on cloudgeni.ai/pricing: Free ($0, 1 cloud account, 2 repos, 50 agent actions/month, DevOps Agent only); Pro $79 per user/month (Remediation, Drift, Import, DevOps and PR Review agents; CIS, SOC 2, ISO 27001); Enterprise custom (all agents, DORA/HIPAA/PCI-DSS frameworks, SSO, self-hosting options). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence): From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published.

Where are Cloudgeni cloud agents and noze CyberAgent headquartered?

Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents) publishes HQ in Norway. noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) publishes HQ in Italy.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents) or noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Use-case comparisons

Related

More Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents) comparisons

More noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) comparisons