Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent vs Filigran XTM One
Quick answer
Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) (Co-Brain (Co-Brain GmbH)) and Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) (Co-Brain (Co-Brain GmbH)) and Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) is tagged for DORA.
| Field |  Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) |  Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Co-Brain (Co-Brain GmbH) | Filigran (Filigran SAS) |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance, Risk | Security |
| Summary | German agent that completes incoming security questionnaires (vendor assessments, TISAX, ISO 27001, DORA) in Excel, PDF, Word or vendor portals from the customer's policies, certificates and past answers, with a source citation on every answer, consistent answers to re-worded questions, expert routing and team approval. | Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | DORA | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | TISAX, ISO 27001, DORA, GDPR | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Capabilities / tasks | questionnaire automation, workflow automation | threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://co-brain.ai/en/questionnaire-agent | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://co-brain.ai/en/questionnaire-agent | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent and Filigran XTM One?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, workflow-automation. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, pen-test-management, exposure-management, threat-detection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation): Not published Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server)
Where are Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent and Filigran XTM One headquartered?
Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) publishes HQ in Germany. Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) or Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) alternatives
- Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) comparisons
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation)
- Cloudgeni cloud agents (Compliance Remediation, Drift & Import, PR Review and other infrastructure agents) vs Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation)
- Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation) vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent (security questionnaire automation)
More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)