Comp AI vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)
Quick answer
Comp AI (Comp AI) and Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) (Modulos) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Comp AI (Comp AI) and Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) (Modulos) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Comp AI is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA.
| Field |  Comp AI |  Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Comp AI | Modulos |
| HQ | United States · North America | Switzerland · Europe |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance | Compliance, Risk |
| Summary | Open-source-leaning AI compliance software that automates evidence collection, policy generation, and continuous monitoring for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPR. | AI governance platform whose agents discover AI systems, assess controls against evidence, quantify AI risk in euros and investigate changes on a schedule, while decisions on the record stay with your team. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP | EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 |
| Capabilities / tasks | evidence collection, policy management, control monitoring, trust center | ai governance, risk assessment, control testing, evidence collection |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based (Startup / Mid-Market / Enterprise). Specific dollar amounts not published on the homepage at last check. | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.trycomp.ai/ | https://www.modulos.ai/modulos-ai-governance-platform/agents |
| Last checked | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.trycomp.ai/ | https://www.modulos.ai/modulos-ai-governance-platform/agents |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Comp AI and Modulos AI governance agents?
Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: evidence-collection. Comp AI-only tasks: policy-management, control-monitoring, trust-center. Modulos AI governance agents-only tasks: ai-governance, risk-assessment, control-testing. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Comp AI: Quote-based (Startup / Mid-Market / Enterprise). Specific dollar amounts not published on the homepage at last check. Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent): Not published
Where are Comp AI and Modulos AI governance agents headquartered?
Comp AI publishes HQ in United States. Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) publishes HQ in Switzerland.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Comp AI or Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI governance agents and platforms — 11 listings (AI inventory, risk assessment, policy and runtime controls for AI systems and agents)
Related
- Comp AI alternatives
- Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) alternatives
- Best compliance AI agents
More Comp AI comparisons
- Sprinto vs Comp AI
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Comp AI
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Comp AI
- Comp AI vs Complyance GRC AI Agents
- Comp AI vs Cypago Agentic Workflows
More Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)