CounterShadow AMI vs Hoxhunt Respond

Quick answer

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) (Hoxhunt) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) (Hoxhunt) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and responseHoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
Vendor CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)Hoxhunt
HQ United Kingdom · EuropeFinland · Europe
Primary category SecuritySecurity
Also listed in SecuritySecurity
Summary UK autonomous SOC product: AMI plans and runs investigation of every SIEM/EDR alert across connected tools without playbooks, returns a true/false-positive verdict with severity and logged evidence in about eight minutes, and can isolate hosts, block IPs or disable accounts under approvals the customer configures.Finnish human-risk platform whose Respond module automatically investigates every employee-reported email, groups related reports into one campaign incident, suppresses safe and duplicate reports, and removes confirmed malicious messages from all affected inboxes without waiting for an analyst.
Frameworks (vendor-stated) ——
Frameworks (vendor-claimed) ——
Capabilities / tasks security operations, alert triage, case investigation, incident responsephishing triage, email security, incident response, remediation
Pricing (as published) Not publishedNot published (per-employee quote after a scoping call)
Pricing model quotequote
Primary source https://countershadow.com/https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation
Last checked 2026-10-202026-10-18
Official site https://countershadow.com/https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between CounterShadow AMI and Hoxhunt Respond?

Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: incident-response. CounterShadow AMI-only tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, case-investigation. Hoxhunt Respond-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response: Not published Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response): Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call)

Where are CounterShadow AMI and Hoxhunt Respond headquartered?

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) publishes HQ in Finland.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response or Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Use-case comparisons

Related

More CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response comparisons

More Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) comparisons