CounterShadow AMI vs Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents

Print / Save PDF

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing) (Imperum) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response	Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing)
Vendor	CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)	Imperum
HQ	United Kingdom · Europe	Netherlands · Europe
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security
Summary	UK autonomous SOC product: AMI plans and runs investigation of every SIEM/EDR alert across connected tools without playbooks, returns a true/false-positive verdict with severity and logged evidence in about eight minutes, and can isolate hosts, block IPs or disable accounts under approvals the customer configures.	Amsterdam-built autonomous SOC platform whose Virtus agents triage every alert through a 7-stage pipeline, return a verdict with confidence and evidence, and hand cases to an investigation agent, with sovereign/on-prem AI options.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	—
Capabilities / tasks	security operations, alert triage, case investigation, incident response	phishing triage, email security, security operations, alert triage, incident response, case investigation
Pricing (as published)	Not published	Not published
Pricing model	quote	quote
Primary source	https://countershadow.com/	https://www.imperum.io/autonomous-soc/virtus-triage
Last checked	2026-10-20	2026-10-18
Official site	https://countershadow.com/	https://www.imperum.io/autonomous-soc/virtus-triage

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between CounterShadow AMI and Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents?

Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, case-investigation, incident-response. CounterShadow AMI-only tasks: none. Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response: Not published Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing): Not published

Where are CounterShadow AMI and Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents headquartered?

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing) publishes HQ in Netherlands.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response or Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) — Configurable AI agents in London-based Napier AI's Continuum financial-crime platform. In Client Screening and Transaction Screening, compliance teams build and tailor 'responsible agents' in a no-code sandbox and choose how much autonomy to hand over, from flagging sanctions, PEP and adverse-media matches for review to clearing known patterns automatically before they reach a queue, with every agent action explained and captured in the audit trail.
• SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
• Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
• Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) — Agentic AI inside Trulioo's KYB verification workflow from Vancouver-headquartered Trulioo. When registries run out, the UBO Discovery Agent researches filings, disclosures, legal and public records, OSINT and verified third-party databases, reaches registries without API connectivity in real time, reconstructs the beneficial-ownership chain with jurisdiction-specific control logic, cites every finding and reports gaps instead of guessing.

Use-case comparisons

• AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
• Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)

Related

• CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response alternatives
• Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing) alternatives
• Best security AI agents

More CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response

More Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing)
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents (Triage, Pilot, Email Phishing)