CounterShadow AMI vs RunSybil Sybil

Print / Save PDF

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) (RunSybil) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response	RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
Vendor	CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)	RunSybil
HQ	United Kingdom · Europe	United States · North America
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security, Code security
Summary	UK autonomous SOC product: AMI plans and runs investigation of every SIEM/EDR alert across connected tools without playbooks, returns a true/false-positive verdict with severity and logged evidence in about eight minutes, and can isolate hosts, block IPs or disable accounts under approvals the customer configures.	AI offensive security platform whose agents run black- or white-box autonomous pentests, chain vulnerabilities across code, APIs, cloud and infrastructure, reproduce every finding, and re-test on each deployment.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	—
Capabilities / tasks	security operations, alert triage, case investigation, incident response	pen test management, attack surface, appsec, vulnerability management
Pricing (as published)	Not published	Not published
Pricing model	quote	quote
Primary source	https://countershadow.com/	https://www.runsybil.com/solutions/autonomous-penetration-testing
Last checked	2026-10-20	2026-10-18
Official site	https://countershadow.com/	https://www.runsybil.com/solutions/autonomous-penetration-testing

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between CounterShadow AMI and RunSybil Sybil?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. CounterShadow AMI-only tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, case-investigation, incident-response. RunSybil Sybil-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, appsec, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response: Not published RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting): Not published

Where are CounterShadow AMI and RunSybil Sybil headquartered?

CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response publishes HQ in United Kingdom. RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) publishes HQ in United States.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response or RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
• SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
• Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

• AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

Related

• CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response alternatives
• RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) alternatives
• Best security AI agents

More CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response

More RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
• Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)