Credo AI vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)
Quick answer
Credo AI (Credo AI) and Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) (Mindlapse (Mindlapse SAS)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Credo AI (Credo AI) and Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) (Mindlapse (Mindlapse SAS)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Credo AI is tagged for ISO 27001, TX-RAMP. Only Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) is tagged for DORA.
| Field |  Credo AI |  Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Credo AI | Mindlapse (Mindlapse SAS) |
| HQ | United States · North America | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance, Risk | Compliance, Risk |
| Summary | AI governance platform for policy packs, model risk and responsible AI compliance including EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF oriented programs. | French agentic Cyber-GRC operating system whose Ernest engine runs separate planner, collector, adjudicator and writer agents to verify every governance claim (from policies, control owners or vendors) against evidence, connector signals and a cyber knowledge graph, returning sourced verdicts with confidence that are re-checked continuously and accepted or rejected by a human. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | ISO 27001, TX-RAMP | DORA |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001 | NIS2, DORA, EU Cyber Resilience Act, EU AI Act |
| Capabilities / tasks | ai governance, policy management, risk assessment | control monitoring, evidence collection, control mapping, vendor risk, risk assessment |
| Pricing (as published) | Not verified | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.credo.ai/ | https://www.mindlapse.ai/platform/ernest/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://www.credo.ai/ | https://www.mindlapse.ai/platform/ernest/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Credo AI and Mindlapse Ernest?
Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: risk-assessment. Credo AI-only tasks: ai-governance, policy-management. Mindlapse Ernest-only tasks: control-monitoring, evidence-collection, control-mapping, vendor-risk. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Credo AI: Not published Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents): Not published
Where are Credo AI and Mindlapse Ernest headquartered?
Credo AI publishes HQ in United States. Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Credo AI or Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- AI governance agents and platforms — 11 listings (AI inventory, risk assessment, policy and runtime controls for AI systems and agents)
Related
- Credo AI alternatives
- Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) alternatives
- Best compliance AI agents
More Credo AI comparisons
- Credo AI vs Optro (formerly AuditBoard)
- Credo AI vs Secureframe
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Credo AI
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Credo AI
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs Credo AI
More Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)
- Egerie Jerry (agentic Cyber GRC platform) vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)
- Fidureon compliance agents vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)
- Hybridity compliance execution platform agents (policy-to-control registry, scheduled evidence and batch contract checks) vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)
- KaitoSec AI agents (agentic ISMS and GRC platform) vs Mindlapse Ernest (agentic Cyber-GRC: compliance, third-party and risk agents)