CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
Quick answer
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and GitHub Copilot coding agent (GitHub) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and GitHub Copilot coding agent (GitHub) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) |  GitHub Copilot coding agent |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS) | GitHub |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Business operations |
| Summary | French AI code security platform (SAST, SCA, IaC, container and secret scanning) whose Cybe AutoFix agent reads the code graph, rewrites vulnerable lines or picks the safest dependency upgrade, tests the change in isolation and opens a bot-signed, CI-gated pull request for a human to merge. | GitHub Copilot’s coding agent. Listed here only for the official workflow that assigns Dependabot security alerts to Copilot (or other agents) to open a draft fix PR. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, remediation, pr review | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. | Requires a Copilot plan that includes coding agent (Copilot Pro is $10/month with included AI credits on github.com/features/copilot/plans) plus GitHub Code Security for assigning Dependabot alerts ($30 per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans; public repos differ). Coding-agent sessions consume GitHub AI credits. |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://github.blog/changelog/2026-04-07-dependabot-alerts-are-now-assignable-to-ai-agents-for-remediation/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/coding-agent |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and GitHub Copilot coding agent?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: sca, remediation. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix-only tasks: appsec, sast, secrets-detection, iac, pr-review. GitHub Copilot coding agent-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests): Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. GitHub Copilot coding agent: Requires a Copilot plan that includes coding agent (Copilot Pro is $10/month with included AI credits on github.com/features/copilot/plans) plus GitHub Code Security for assigning Dependabot alerts ($30 per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans; public repos differ). Coding-agent sessions consume GitHub AI credits.
Where are CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and GitHub Copilot coding agent headquartered?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) publishes HQ in France. GitHub Copilot coding agent publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) alternatives
- GitHub Copilot coding agent alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
More GitHub Copilot coding agent comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs GitHub Copilot coding agent