CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix vs Kalpita CodeGuard
Quick answer
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and Kalpita CodeGuard (Kalpita Technologies) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and Kalpita CodeGuard (Kalpita Technologies) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS) | Kalpita Technologies |
| HQ | France · Europe | India · India |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | French AI code security platform (SAST, SCA, IaC, container and secret scanning) whose Cybe AutoFix agent reads the code graph, rewrites vulnerable lines or picks the safest dependency upgrade, tests the change in isolation and opens a bot-signed, CI-gated pull request for a human to merge. | Indian autonomous DevSecOps agent that scans each commit, generates a secure patch and opens a human-approved pull request. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, remediation, pr review | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, secrets detection, iac |
| Pricing (as published) | Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. | Not published (demo request). |
| Pricing model | freemium | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and Kalpita CodeGuard?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, secrets-detection, iac, remediation, pr-review. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix-only tasks: sca. Kalpita CodeGuard-only tasks: none. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests): Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. Kalpita CodeGuard: Not published (demo request).
Where are CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and Kalpita CodeGuard headquartered?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) publishes HQ in France. Kalpita CodeGuard publishes HQ in India.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) or Kalpita CodeGuard. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) alternatives
- Kalpita CodeGuard alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
More Kalpita CodeGuard comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kalpita CodeGuard
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Kalpita CodeGuard
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Kalpita CodeGuard
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Kalpita CodeGuard
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Kalpita CodeGuard