CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix vs Qodo multi-agent code review
Quick answer
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS) | Qodo (Codium Ltd.) |
| HQ | France · Europe | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security |
| Summary | French AI code security platform (SAST, SCA, IaC, container and secret scanning) whose Cybe AutoFix agent reads the code graph, rewrites vulnerable lines or picks the safest dependency upgrade, tests the change in isolation and opens a bot-signed, CI-gated pull request for a human to merge. | Agentic pull-request review platform (formerly CodiumAI) that flags bugs, security issues and rule violations with organisational context. A general code reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, remediation, pr review | pr review, appsec, code quality |
| Pricing (as published) | Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. | Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and Qodo multi-agent code review?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pr-review. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix-only tasks: sast, sca, secrets-detection, iac, remediation. Qodo multi-agent code review-only tasks: code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests): Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. Qodo multi-agent code review: Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page.
Where are CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and Qodo multi-agent code review headquartered?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) publishes HQ in France. Qodo multi-agent code review publishes HQ in Israel.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) or Qodo multi-agent code review. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) alternatives
- Qodo multi-agent code review alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
More Qodo multi-agent code review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Qodo multi-agent code review