CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix vs ZeroPath
Quick answer
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) (CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS) | ZeroPath |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | French AI code security platform (SAST, SCA, IaC, container and secret scanning) whose Cybe AutoFix agent reads the code graph, rewrites vulnerable lines or picks the safest dependency upgrade, tests the change in isolation and opens a bot-signed, CI-gated pull request for a human to merge. | AI-native AppSec platform that finds business-logic and auth flaws, validates findings from existing SAST tools, runs PR security reviews and generates one-click patches refined in natural language. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, remediation, pr review | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. | Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and ZeroPath?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, sca, remediation, pr-review. CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix-only tasks: secrets-detection, iac. ZeroPath-only tasks: none. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests): Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote. ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix): Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%.
Where are CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix and ZeroPath headquartered?
CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) publishes HQ in France. ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) or ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) alternatives
- ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)
More ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)