Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent

Print / Save PDF

Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) (Cytix (Cytix Ltd)) and Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)	Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
Vendor	Cytix (Cytix Ltd)	GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)
HQ	United Kingdom · Europe	Japan · Asia Pacific
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	Manchester software-change security platform that risk-scores every code change, automatically approves changes that fall within the customer's own policy and escalates the rest, then sends sandboxed AI pentest agents against high-risk changes and logs every decision and tool call as an audit-ready change record.	Japanese security AI agent that continuously finds vulnerabilities with AI-SAST and AI-DAST (including logic, authentication and authorisation flaws), generates fix patches and opens pull requests with unit tests, and runs AI penetration tests that actually attempt intrusion to prove exploitability.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	ISO 27001 (ISMS certification, vendor claim)
Capabilities / tasks	pen test management, appsec, risk assessment, workflow automation	appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, pen test management, vulnerability management
Pricing (as published)	Not published	Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026).
Pricing model	quote	published-tiers
Primary source	https://cytix.io/solutions/agentic-pentesting	https://flatt.tech/takumi
Last checked	2026-10-20	2026-10-20
Official site	https://cytix.io/	https://flatt.tech/takumi

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals and Takumi byGMO security AI agent?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: pen-test-management, appsec. Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals-only tasks: risk-assessment, workflow-automation. Takumi byGMO security AI agent-only tasks: sast, remediation, pr-review, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security): Not published Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing): Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026).

Where are Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals and Takumi byGMO security AI agent headquartered?

Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) publishes HQ in Japan.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) or Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.

Use-case comparisons

• AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

Related

• Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) alternatives
• Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) alternatives
• Best code security AI agents

More Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) comparisons

• Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)
• AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)
• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)
• Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)

More Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) comparisons

• Aikido AI AutoFix vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
• AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
• Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
• Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)