Decanos AI Agents vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
Quick answer
Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations) (Decanos (Decanos GmbH)) and YesWeHack Agentic Pentest (YesWeHack) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations) (Decanos (Decanos GmbH)) and YesWeHack Agentic Pentest (YesWeHack) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  YesWeHack Agentic Pentest | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Decanos (Decanos GmbH) | YesWeHack |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Berlin security platform whose specialist AI agents triage alerts, assemble investigations, run continuous threat hunts, execute containment and update compliance reporting across connected tools such as CrowdStrike, Splunk, Elastic, SentinelOne, Microsoft Sentinel and Wiz, with autonomy levels, escalation thresholds and approval gates set per agent and per action type. | On-demand pentests of external attack surface run by AI agents shaped by YesWeHack's bug-hunting expertise, with dedicated verification agents, a Pentest Manager, same-day results and reports in its vulnerability-management platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | alert triage, case investigation, threat detection, incident response, security operations | pen test management, attack surface, appsec, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (custom quote by protected assets and enabled modules; multi-year and MSSP pricing on request) | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://decanos.com/platform/ai-agents | https://www.yeswehack.com/product/agentic-pentest |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://decanos.com/platform/ai-agents | https://www.yeswehack.com/product/agentic-pentest |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Decanos AI Agents and YesWeHack Agentic Pentest?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Decanos AI Agents-only tasks: alert-triage, case-investigation, threat-detection, incident-response, security-operations. YesWeHack Agentic Pentest-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, appsec, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations): Not published (custom quote by protected assets and enabled modules; multi-year and MSSP pricing on request) YesWeHack Agentic Pentest: Not published
Where are Decanos AI Agents and YesWeHack Agentic Pentest headquartered?
Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations) publishes HQ in Germany. YesWeHack Agentic Pentest publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations) or YesWeHack Agentic Pentest. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
- Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations) alternatives
- YesWeHack Agentic Pentest alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Decanos AI Agents (Triage, Investigate, Hunt, Response and Compliance agents for autonomous security operations)
More YesWeHack Agentic Pentest comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest