depthfirst autonomous security agents vs Qodo multi-agent code review
Quick answer
depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) (depthfirst (DepthFirst AI, Inc.)) and Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) (depthfirst (DepthFirst AI, Inc.)) and Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) |  Qodo multi-agent code review |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | depthfirst (DepthFirst AI, Inc.) | Qodo (Codium Ltd.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security |
| Summary | San Francisco application-security platform whose autonomous AI agents trace business logic and data flows to find exploitable code vulnerabilities, check dependency reachability and secrets, review pull requests with proposed fixes, and run agentic pentests against running applications, re-running each attack after a fix merges to confirm it is closed. | Agentic pull-request review platform (formerly CodiumAI) that flags bugs, security issues and rule violations with organisational context. A general code reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, pr review, remediation, pen test management | pr review, appsec, code quality |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://depthfirst.com/ | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://depthfirst.com/ | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between depthfirst autonomous security agents and Qodo multi-agent code review?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pr-review. depthfirst autonomous security agents-only tasks: sast, sca, secrets-detection, remediation, pen-test-management. Qodo multi-agent code review-only tasks: code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting): Not published Qodo multi-agent code review: Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page.
Where are depthfirst autonomous security agents and Qodo multi-agent code review headquartered?
depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) publishes HQ in United States. Qodo multi-agent code review publishes HQ in Israel.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) or Qodo multi-agent code review. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) alternatives
- Qodo multi-agent code review alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)
More Qodo multi-agent code review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Qodo multi-agent code review