Drata vs Fieldguide Field Agents
Quick answer
Drata (Drata) and Fieldguide Field Agents (Fieldguide) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Drata (Drata) and Fieldguide Field Agents (Fieldguide) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Drata is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP, CMMC.
| Field |  Drata | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Drata | Fieldguide |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance, Risk | Compliance, Risk |
| Summary | Compliance and trust management platform with AI-assisted evidence collection, continuous control monitoring, and multi-framework programs. | Agent workforce for audit and advisory firms: agents plan engagements, run testing through to workpapers, review conclusions against evidence and draft financial statements, coordinated by Field Orchestrator. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, FedRAMP, CMMC | — |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | Drata Trust Management Platform · FedRAMP Authorized · FR2600167032 · 20x Low · authorized 2025-12-05 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, NIST, CMMC, EU Cyber Resilience Act, AIUC-1 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | evidence collection, control monitoring, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, trust center | audit management, control testing, evidence collection |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | AWS, Azure | Not recorded in this dataset yet |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based. AWS Marketplace Foundation Package listed at $15,000/year for 1–50 employees (third-party census of marketplace listing). Drata says Agentic TPRM is not priced by vendor count: every vendor gets a free inherent-risk assessment and customers pay only when a vendor needs a full security review (amounts not published). | Not published |
| Pricing model | annual-contract | quote |
| Primary source | https://drata.com/ | https://www.fieldguide.com/products/agents/overview |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://drata.com/ | https://www.fieldguide.com/products/agents/overview |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Drata and Fieldguide Field Agents?
Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: evidence-collection. Drata-only tasks: control-monitoring, questionnaire-automation, vendor-risk, trust-center. Fieldguide Field Agents-only tasks: audit-management, control-testing. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Drata: Quote-based. AWS Marketplace Foundation Package listed at $15,000/year for 1–50 employees (third-party census of marketplace listing). Drata says Agentic TPRM is not priced by vendor count: every vendor gets a free inherent-risk assessment and customers pay only when a vendor needs a full security review (amounts not published). Fieldguide Field Agents: Not published
Where are Drata and Fieldguide Field Agents headquartered?
Drata publishes HQ in United States. Fieldguide Field Agents publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Drata or Fieldguide Field Agents. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
More Drata comparisons
- Vanta vs Drata
- Drata vs Secureframe
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Drata
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Drata
- Complyance GRC AI Agents vs Drata
More Fieldguide Field Agents comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs Fieldguide Field Agents
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs Fieldguide Field Agents