Edgescan Atomic vs Hoxhunt Respond
Quick answer
Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform) (Edgescan (BCC Risk Advisory Limited)) and Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) (Hoxhunt) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform) (Edgescan (BCC Risk Advisory Limited)) and Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) (Hoxhunt) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform) |  Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Edgescan (BCC Risk Advisory Limited) | Hoxhunt |
| HQ | Ireland · Europe | Finland · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Autonomous penetration testing built into the Dublin-based Edgescan platform, launched October 7, 2026. A team of narrow AI agents plans, adapts, chains vulnerabilities and validates real impact on web applications, using Edgescan's existing asset context and findings, while a deterministic 'Harness' enforces scope, permissions, approvals and allowed actions. Findings land alongside Edgescan's DAST, PTaaS and ASM results. | Finnish human-risk platform whose Respond module automatically investigates every employee-reported email, groups related reports into one campaign incident, suppresses safe and duplicate reports, and removes confirmed malicious messages from all affected inboxes without waiting for an analyst. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, vulnerability management, appsec, exposure management | phishing triage, email security, incident response, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published. Atomic runs on Atomic Attack Credits assigned per asset in the Edgescan platform; pricing by quote/demo. | Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call) |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.edgescan.com/introducing-edgescan-atomic/ | https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.edgescan.com/the-platform/atomic-autonomous-penetration-testing-edgescan/ | https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Edgescan Atomic and Hoxhunt Respond?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Edgescan Atomic-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, vulnerability-management, appsec, exposure-management. Hoxhunt Respond-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, incident-response, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform): Not published. Atomic runs on Atomic Attack Credits assigned per asset in the Edgescan platform; pricing by quote/demo. Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response): Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call)
Where are Edgescan Atomic and Hoxhunt Respond headquartered?
Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform) publishes HQ in Ireland. Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) publishes HQ in Finland.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform) or Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform) alternatives
- Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Edgescan Atomic (agentic autonomous penetration testing in the Edgescan platform)
More Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)