Agent Index by Heritage Services
Submit / Claim
Home / Compare / episki Autonomous GRC vs OnFinance AI Maxwell

episki Autonomous GRC vs OnFinance AI Maxwell

Quick answer

episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) and OnFinance AI Maxwell (open-source cybersecurity and compliance agent for Indian BFSI) (OnFinance AI (Mindweave Transformers Private Limited, Bengaluru)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) and OnFinance AI Maxwell (open-source cybersecurity and compliance agent for Indian BFSI) (OnFinance AI (Mindweave Transformers Private Limited, Bengaluru)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only OnFinance AI Maxwell (open-source cybersecurity and compliance agent for Indian BFSI) is tagged for CERT-In, DPDP.

Columns

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)OnFinance AI Maxwell (open-source cybersecurity and compliance agent for Indian BFSI)
Vendor episki (episki, llc)OnFinance AI (Mindweave Transformers Private Limited, Bengaluru)
HQ United States · North AmericaIndia · India
Primary category ComplianceCompliance
Also listed in Compliance, RiskCompliance, Security
Summary A GRC platform built around agents that draft policies, answer inbound security questionnaires, review vendors' SOC 2 and CAIQ responses, map controls, assess risks and write deterministic evidence-collection recipes. Every plan, step-run and sensitive action goes through human approvals and safety floors. Pricing is published.Free, self-hosted, open-source (AGPL-3.0) agent from India's OnFinance AI for banks, brokers, NBFCs, AMCs, insurers and fintechs. It runs 26 workflows of specialist agents that keep a company's regulatory profile current, probe repositories, infrastructure and vendors for gaps against SEBI, RBI, IRDAI, CERT-In and DPDP controls, and write findings (each citing a specific clause), remediation plans and audit reports into a validated, append-only ledger for human review.
Frameworks (vendor-stated) —CERT-In, DPDP
Frameworks (vendor-claimed) SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CMMC, HIPAA, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act—
Capabilities / tasks policy management, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, evidence collection, control mapping, risk assessment, trust centercompliance posture, control monitoring, evidence collection, vendor risk, remediation, audit management
Pricing (as published) Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited.Free and open source (AGPL-3.0, github.com/OnFinance/Maxwell); you pay only for your own AI model usage. OnFinance's separate ComplianceOS platform pricing is not part of this listing.
Pricing model published-tiersfreemium
Primary source https://episki.com/product/aihttps://github.com/OnFinance/Maxwell
Last checked 2026-10-192026-10-20
Official site https://episki.com/product/aihttps://github.com/OnFinance/Maxwell

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between episki Autonomous GRC and OnFinance AI Maxwell?

Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: vendor-risk, evidence-collection. episki Autonomous GRC-only tasks: policy-management, questionnaire-automation, control-mapping, risk-assessment, trust-center. OnFinance AI Maxwell-only tasks: compliance-posture, control-monitoring, remediation, audit-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence): Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited. OnFinance AI Maxwell (open-source cybersecurity and compliance agent for Indian BFSI): Free and open source (AGPL-3.0, github.com/OnFinance/Maxwell); you pay only for your own AI model usage. OnFinance's separate ComplianceOS platform pricing is not part of this listing.

Where are episki Autonomous GRC and OnFinance AI Maxwell headquartered?

episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) publishes HQ in United States. OnFinance AI Maxwell (open-source cybersecurity and compliance agent for Indian BFSI) publishes HQ in India.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) or OnFinance AI Maxwell (open-source cybersecurity and compliance agent for Indian BFSI). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Use-case comparisons

Related

More episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) comparisons

More OnFinance AI Maxwell (open-source cybersecurity and compliance agent for Indian BFSI) comparisons