episki Autonomous GRC vs RegASK AI agents
Quick answer
episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) and RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows) (RegASK (RegASK Pte.
Ltd.)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.
This is not a ranking.
episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) and RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows) (RegASK (RegASK Pte. Ltd.)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) |  RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | episki (episki, llc) | RegASK (RegASK Pte. Ltd.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Singapore · Asia Pacific |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance, Risk | Compliance, Risk |
| Summary | A GRC platform built around agents that draft policies, answer inbound security questionnaires, review vendors' SOC 2 and CAIQ responses, map controls, assess risks and write deterministic evidence-collection recipes. Every plan, step-run and sensitive action goes through human approvals and safety floors. Pricing is published. | Singapore-based RegASK monitors regulatory change in 160+ markets for life sciences and consumer products companies, and its AI agents assess impact on products and markets, assign follow-up tasks and execute subsequent actions in configurable workflows, with expert review and a recorded outcome for each run. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CMMC, HIPAA, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | policy management, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, evidence collection, control mapping, risk assessment, trust center | workflow automation, compliance workflows, risk assessment |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | Not recorded in this dataset yet | Veeva RIM, Esko, Microsoft Marketplace, MCP |
| Pricing (as published) | Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited. | Not published (demo request on regask.com, checked 2026-10-27) |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://episki.com/product/ai | https://regask.com/regask-expands-ai-agents-to-automate-regulatory-action-across-160-markets/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-27 |
| Official site | https://episki.com/product/ai | https://regask.com/product/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between episki Autonomous GRC and RegASK AI agents?
Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: risk-assessment. episki Autonomous GRC-only tasks: policy-management, questionnaire-automation, vendor-risk, evidence-collection, control-mapping, trust-center. RegASK AI agents-only tasks: workflow-automation, compliance-workflows. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence): Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited. RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows): Not published (demo request on regask.com, checked 2026-10-27)
Where are episki Autonomous GRC and RegASK AI agents headquartered?
episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) publishes HQ in United States. RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows) publishes HQ in Singapore.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) or RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
Related
- episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) alternatives
- RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows) alternatives
- Best compliance AI agents
More episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)
More RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows)
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows)
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows)
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows)
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs RegASK AI agents (regulatory intelligence and action workflows)