Home / Compare / episki Autonomous GRC vs VibrantiX agentic compliance platform

episki Autonomous GRC vs VibrantiX agentic compliance platform

Quick answer

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) (episki (episki, llc)) and VibrantiX agentic compliance platform (Evidence Review, Vendor Risk Scoring, Risk Detection, Customer Trust, Policy Drafting and Control Remediation agents) (VibrantiX (Vibrantix, Inc.)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only VibrantiX agentic compliance platform (Evidence Review, Vendor Risk Scoring, Risk Detection, Customer Trust, Policy Drafting and Control Remediation agents) is tagged for ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, DORA, DPDP.

Field	episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence)	VibrantiX agentic compliance platform (Evidence Review, Vendor Risk Scoring, Risk Detection, Customer Trust, Policy Drafting and Control Remediation agents)
Vendor	episki (episki, llc)	VibrantiX (Vibrantix, Inc.)
HQ	United States · North America	Singapore · Asia Pacific
Primary category	Compliance	Compliance
Also listed in	Compliance, Risk	Compliance, Risk
Summary	A GRC platform built around agents that draft policies, answer inbound security questionnaires, review vendors' SOC 2 and CAIQ responses, map controls, assess risks and write deterministic evidence-collection recipes. Every plan, step-run and sensitive action goes through human approvals and safety floors. Pricing is published.	Singapore-headquartered agentic compliance platform whose named agents review uploaded evidence against framework controls and flag gaps, score vendors from 12+ external sources without questionnaires, scan cloud posture and auto-escalate critical findings to the risk register, draft answers to customer security questionnaires (SIG, CAIQ, custom) from live policies, draft policies, and generate fixes for failed controls and mark them ready for re-audit.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, DORA, DPDP
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, CMMC, HIPAA, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act	ISO 27001, SOC 2, EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, DORA, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, DPDP, PDPA, MAS TRM, APRA CPS 234, PCI DSS
Capabilities / tasks	policy management, questionnaire automation, vendor risk, evidence collection, control mapping, risk assessment, trust center	evidence collection, vendor risk, questionnaire automation, policy management, remediation, control mapping
Pricing (as published)	Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited.	Not published
Pricing model	published-tiers	quote
Primary source	https://episki.com/product/ai	https://vibrantix.ai/
Last checked	2026-10-19	2026-10-20
Official site	https://episki.com/product/ai	https://vibrantix.ai/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between episki Autonomous GRC and VibrantiX agentic compliance platform?

Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: policy-management, questionnaire-automation, vendor-risk, evidence-collection, control-mapping. episki Autonomous GRC-only tasks: risk-assessment, trust-center. VibrantiX agentic compliance platform-only tasks: remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence): Published on episki.com/pricing: Compliance Platform $7,500/year (required base); modules Risk Management +$4,800/year, Third-Party Risk Management +$6,000/year, Trust +$7,200/year, AI Governance +$6,000/year; EU/Canada data residency +$6,000/year; shared AI token pool with overage at $0.50 per 1K tokens. Users, frameworks and vendors unlimited. VibrantiX agentic compliance platform (Evidence Review, Vendor Risk Scoring, Risk Detection, Customer Trust, Policy Drafting and Control Remediation agents): Not published

Where are episki Autonomous GRC and VibrantiX agentic compliance platform headquartered?

episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) publishes HQ in United States. VibrantiX agentic compliance platform (Evidence Review, Vendor Risk Scoring, Risk Detection, Customer Trust, Policy Drafting and Control Remediation agents) publishes HQ in Singapore.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) or VibrantiX agentic compliance platform (Evidence Review, Vendor Risk Scoring, Risk Detection, Customer Trust, Policy Drafting and Control Remediation agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)

More episki Autonomous GRC (AI Orchestration agents for policies, questionnaires, vendors and evidence) comparisons

More VibrantiX agentic compliance platform (Evidence Review, Vendor Risk Scoring, Risk Detection, Customer Trust, Policy Drafting and Control Remediation agents) comparisons