Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) vs Intruder AI Pentesting
Quick answer
Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) (Equixly) and Intruder AI Pentesting (Intruder) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) (Equixly) and Intruder AI Pentesting (Intruder) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Equixly | Intruder |
| HQ | Italy · Europe | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Italian offensive-security platform whose agentic AI hacker continuously maps APIs and applications, chains API interactions to find exploitable flaws, and validates findings for remediation. | On-demand, code-aware web-app pentesting by AI agents built by Intruder's CREST-certified testers, with audit-ready reports in hours and issue-level 'micro pentests' to triage scanner findings. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, attack surface | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Penetration Test: €4,999 per test (results in 2 days, blackbox/greybox, full audit report). Continuous Equixly Platform: custom pricing (equixly.com/pricing). | AI web-app pentests start from $3,500 per test; the scanning platform has a free-forever plan and paid monthly/annual tiers (intruder.io/pricing). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://equixly.com/ | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://equixly.com/ | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Equixly Agentic AI Hacker and Intruder AI Pentesting?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: pen-test-management, appsec. Equixly Agentic AI Hacker-only tasks: attack-surface. Intruder AI Pentesting-only tasks: vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting): Penetration Test: €4,999 per test (results in 2 days, blackbox/greybox, full audit report). Continuous Equixly Platform: custom pricing (equixly.com/pricing). Intruder AI Pentesting: AI web-app pentests start from $3,500 per test; the scanning platform has a free-forever plan and paid monthly/annual tiers (intruder.io/pricing).
Where are Equixly Agentic AI Hacker and Intruder AI Pentesting headquartered?
Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) publishes HQ in Italy. Intruder AI Pentesting publishes HQ in United Kingdom.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) or Intruder AI Pentesting. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) alternatives
- Intruder AI Pentesting alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
More Intruder AI Pentesting comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Intruder AI Pentesting