Equixly Agentic AI Hacker vs Maze AI Agents
Quick answer
Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) (Equixly) and Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) (Maze) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) (Equixly) and Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) (Maze) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) |  Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Equixly | Maze |
| HQ | Italy · Europe | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Italian offensive-security platform whose agentic AI hacker continuously maps APIs and applications, chains API interactions to find exploitable flaws, and validates findings for remediation. | UK AI agents that investigate every cloud and code vulnerability with code-to-cloud context, decide exploitability and deliver fixes. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, attack surface | cloud security, vulnerability management, remediation, sca, sast |
| Pricing (as published) | Penetration Test: €4,999 per test (results in 2 days, blackbox/greybox, full audit report). Continuous Equixly Platform: custom pricing (equixly.com/pricing). | Not published. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://equixly.com/ | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://equixly.com/ | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Equixly Agentic AI Hacker and Maze AI Agents?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Equixly Agentic AI Hacker-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec, attack-surface. Maze AI Agents-only tasks: cloud-security, vulnerability-management, remediation, sca, sast. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting): Penetration Test: €4,999 per test (results in 2 days, blackbox/greybox, full audit report). Continuous Equixly Platform: custom pricing (equixly.com/pricing). Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code): Not published.
Where are Equixly Agentic AI Hacker and Maze AI Agents headquartered?
Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) publishes HQ in Italy. Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) publishes HQ in United Kingdom.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) or Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Cloud security (CNAPP) AI agents — 9 listings (Cloud and container security posture, exposure and remediation)
Related
- Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) alternatives
- Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker (continuous API pentesting)
More Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)