Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) vs Wiz
Quick answer
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) (Ethiack) and Wiz (Wiz) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) (Ethiack) and Wiz (Wiz) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Wiz is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, TX-RAMP.
| Field |  Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) |  Wiz |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Ethiack | Wiz |
| HQ | Portugal · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Risk |
| Summary | Portuguese autonomous pentesting platform: the Hackian agentic AI maps the attack surface, runs exploitation routines, chains attack paths and delivers proof-of-exploit with compliance-ready reports. | Cloud security / CNAPP platform with agentless visibility, risk prioritization and security graph across cloud environments. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, TX-RAMP |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | — | Wiz for U.S. Government · FedRAMP Authorized · FR2308034636A · High · authorized 2025-09-25 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management | cloud security, vulnerability management, risk prioritization |
| Pricing (as published) | Published on ethiack.com/pricing: on-demand pentest €3,000 per test; Continuous 'Core' €9,000/year (shown as 25% off €12,000); Enterprise custom. Guarantee offer: free of charge unless a validated, proven-exploitable vulnerability is found. | Custom quote (wiz.io/pricing). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://ethiack.com/ | https://www.wiz.io/pricing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://ethiack.com/ | https://www.wiz.io/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Ethiack Hackian and Wiz?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Ethiack Hackian-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management. Wiz-only tasks: cloud-security, vulnerability-management, risk-prioritization. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting): Published on ethiack.com/pricing: on-demand pentest €3,000 per test; Continuous 'Core' €9,000/year (shown as 25% off €12,000); Enterprise custom. Guarantee offer: free of charge unless a validated, proven-exploitable vulnerability is found. Wiz: Custom quote (wiz.io/pricing).
Where are Ethiack Hackian and Wiz headquartered?
Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) publishes HQ in Portugal. Wiz publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) or Wiz. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
- Cloud security (CNAPP) AI agents — 9 listings (Cloud and container security posture, exposure and remediation)
Related
More Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Ethiack Hackian (agentic AI pentesting)