Fieldguide Field Agents vs trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents)

Print / Save PDF

Fieldguide Field Agents (Fieldguide) and trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) (trail (trail GmbH, part of Collibra since Oct 2026)) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) is tagged for EU AI Act, ISO 42001.

Columns

Fieldguide Field Agents trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	Fieldguide Field Agents	trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents)
Vendor	Fieldguide	trail (trail GmbH, part of Collibra since Oct 2026)
HQ	United States · North America	Germany · Europe
Primary category	Compliance	Compliance
Also listed in	Compliance, Risk	Compliance, Risk
Summary	Agent workforce for audit and advisory firms: agents plan engagements, run testing through to workpapers, review conclusions against evidence and draft financial statements, coordinated by Field Orchestrator.	Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	EU AI Act, ISO 42001
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF
Capabilities / tasks	audit management, control testing, evidence collection	evidence collection, control testing, risk assessment, vendor risk, policy management, gap analysis, questionnaire automation, ai governance, workflow automation
Integrations (vendor-listed)	Not recorded in this dataset yet	OneTrust, Collibra, ServiceNow, SAP LeanIX, Jira, Confluence, GitHub, GitLab, SharePoint, Notion, Databricks, MLflow
Pricing (as published)	Not published	Not published (demo request on trail-ml.com, checked 2026-10-26)
Pricing model	quote	quote
Primary source	https://www.fieldguide.com/products/agents/overview	https://www.trail-ml.com/agents
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-26
Official site	https://www.fieldguide.com/products/agents/overview	https://www.trail-ml.com/agents

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Fieldguide Field Agents and trail Governance Agents?

Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: control-testing, evidence-collection. Fieldguide Field Agents-only tasks: audit-management. trail Governance Agents-only tasks: risk-assessment, vendor-risk, policy-management, gap-analysis, questionnaire-automation, ai-governance, workflow-automation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Fieldguide Field Agents: Not published trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents): Not published (demo request on trail-ml.com, checked 2026-10-26)

Where are Fieldguide Field Agents and trail Governance Agents headquartered?

Fieldguide Field Agents publishes HQ in United States. trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) publishes HQ in Germany.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Fieldguide Field Agents or trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.

Use-case comparisons

• TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
• AI governance agents and platforms — 11 listings (AI inventory, risk assessment, policy and runtime controls for AI systems and agents)
• Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)

Related

• Fieldguide Field Agents alternatives
• trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) alternatives
• Best compliance AI agents

More Fieldguide Field Agents comparisons

• 6clicks Hailey AI vs Fieldguide Field Agents
• Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Fieldguide Field Agents
• Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs Fieldguide Field Agents
• Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs Fieldguide Field Agents
• Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs Fieldguide Field Agents

More trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) comparisons

• 6clicks Hailey AI vs trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents)
• Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents)
• Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents)
• Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents)
• Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents)