Filigran XTM One vs Proofpoint Satori agents
Quick answer
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent) (Proofpoint) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent) (Proofpoint) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) |  Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Filigran (Filigran SAS) | Proofpoint |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. | Agentic AI layer inside Proofpoint's platform. The Satori Abuse Mailbox Agent classifies every user-reported email that needs manual review (phish, malware, spam or clean) and can trigger configured quarantine or tagging workflows. A DLP Triage Agent does the same for data-loss alerts, with guardrails, chat explanations and audit logs. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection | phishing triage, email security, alert triage, security operations |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) | Not published as list prices. The Abuse Mailbox Agent datasheet describes an action-based model (pay for automated work performed, not users, tokens or seats) without dollar amounts. |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://www.proofpoint.com/us/platform/satori |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://www.proofpoint.com/us/platform/satori |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Filigran XTM One and Proofpoint Satori agents?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, pen-test-management, exposure-management, threat-detection. Proofpoint Satori agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, alert-triage, security-operations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent): Not published as list prices. The Abuse Mailbox Agent datasheet describes an action-based model (pay for automated work performed, not users, tokens or seats) without dollar amounts.
Where are Filigran XTM One and Proofpoint Satori agents headquartered?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France. Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) or Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
- Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
More Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Proofpoint Satori agents (Abuse Mailbox Agent and DLP Triage Agent)