Filigran XTM One vs Vulnetic Sable
Quick answer
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent) (Vulnetic (Vulnetic Inc.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent) (Vulnetic (Vulnetic Inc.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) |  Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Filigran (Filigran SAS) | Vulnetic (Vulnetic Inc.) |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. | Agentic pentesting agent for internal security teams and MSSPs. Sable plans and executes authorised tests against web applications, APIs, internal networks and Active Directory, runs real tools, proves impact with reproducible evidence and exploit traces, and supports targeted retests after remediation; teams steer it in plain language and can approve every command or let it run fully autonomously. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection | pen test management, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) | Not published on the pages we could read on 2026-10-21 (check the vendor pricing section) |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://www.vulnetic.ai/ai-pentesting-agent |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-21 |
| Official site | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://www.vulnetic.ai/ai-pentesting-agent |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Filigran XTM One and Vulnetic Sable?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: pen-test-management. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, exposure-management, threat-detection. Vulnetic Sable-only tasks: vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent): Not published on the pages we could read on 2026-10-21 (check the vendor pricing section)
Where are Filigran XTM One and Vulnetic Sable headquartered?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France. Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) or Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
- Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
More Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Vulnetic Sable (AI pentesting agent)