GitHub Copilot coding agent vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent
Quick answer
GitHub Copilot coding agent (GitHub) and Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
GitHub Copilot coding agent (GitHub) and Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  GitHub Copilot coding agent |  Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GitHub | GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Japan · Asia Pacific |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Business operations | Code security, Security |
| Summary | GitHub Copilot’s coding agent. Listed here only for the official workflow that assigns Dependabot security alerts to Copilot (or other agents) to open a draft fix PR. | Japanese security AI agent that continuously finds vulnerabilities with AI-SAST and AI-DAST (including logic, authentication and authorisation flaws), generates fix patches and opens pull requests with unit tests, and runs AI penetration tests that actually attempt intrusion to prove exploitability. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | ISO 27001 (ISMS certification, vendor claim) |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, pen test management, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Requires a Copilot plan that includes coding agent (Copilot Pro is $10/month with included AI credits on github.com/features/copilot/plans) plus GitHub Code Security for assigning Dependabot alerts ($30 per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans; public repos differ). Coding-agent sessions consume GitHub AI credits. | Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026). |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://github.blog/changelog/2026-04-07-dependabot-alerts-are-now-assignable-to-ai-agents-for-remediation/ | https://flatt.tech/takumi |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/concepts/agents/coding-agent | https://flatt.tech/takumi |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between GitHub Copilot coding agent and Takumi byGMO security AI agent?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: remediation. GitHub Copilot coding agent-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations, sca. Takumi byGMO security AI agent-only tasks: appsec, sast, pr-review, pen-test-management, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
GitHub Copilot coding agent: Requires a Copilot plan that includes coding agent (Copilot Pro is $10/month with included AI credits on github.com/features/copilot/plans) plus GitHub Code Security for assigning Dependabot alerts ($30 per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans; public repos differ). Coding-agent sessions consume GitHub AI credits. Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing): Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026).
Where are GitHub Copilot coding agent and Takumi byGMO security AI agent headquartered?
GitHub Copilot coding agent publishes HQ in United States. Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) publishes HQ in Japan.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- GitHub Copilot coding agent alternatives
- Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More GitHub Copilot coding agent comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs GitHub Copilot coding agent
More Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)