GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution vs Veracode Fix
Quick answer
GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution (GitLab) and Veracode Fix (Veracode) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution (GitLab) and Veracode Fix (Veracode) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution |  Veracode Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GitLab | Veracode |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | GitLab Duo features that explain SAST vulnerabilities and open merge requests with proposed AI remediations, including an agentic resolution flow. | Veracode’s AI-assisted remediation for SAST flaws and SCA dependency vulnerabilities, with suggested patches in IDE, CLI and SCM workflows. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Requires GitLab Ultimate and a GitLab Duo add-on (Duo Enterprise or Duo with Amazon Q per docs). GitLab.com Premium is published at $29 per user/month billed annually with included GitLab Credits; Ultimate is listed on about.gitlab.com/pricing without a public dollar amount (sales/credits). Confirm current Duo add-on prices with GitLab. | Not verified |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/remediate/duo/ | https://www.veracode.com/products/fix/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerabilities/ | https://www.veracode.com/products/fix/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution and Veracode Fix?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability-management. GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution-only tasks: none. Veracode Fix-only tasks: sca. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution: Requires GitLab Ultimate and a GitLab Duo add-on (Duo Enterprise or Duo with Amazon Q per docs). GitLab.com Premium is published at $29 per user/month billed annually with included GitLab Credits; Ultimate is listed on about.gitlab.com/pricing without a public dollar amount (sales/credits). Confirm current Duo add-on prices with GitLab. Veracode Fix: Not published
Where are GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution and Veracode Fix headquartered?
GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution publishes HQ in United States. Veracode Fix publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution or Veracode Fix. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution alternatives
- Veracode Fix alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
- Checkmarx One Assist vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
More Veracode Fix comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Veracode Fix
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Veracode Fix
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Veracode Fix
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Veracode Fix
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Veracode Fix