GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
Quick answer
GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution (GitLab) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution (GitLab) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GitLab | ZeroPath |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | GitLab Duo features that explain SAST vulnerabilities and open merge requests with proposed AI remediations, including an agentic resolution flow. | AI-native AppSec platform that finds business-logic and auth flaws, validates findings from existing SAST tools, runs PR security reviews and generates one-click patches refined in natural language. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Requires GitLab Ultimate and a GitLab Duo add-on (Duo Enterprise or Duo with Amazon Q per docs). GitLab.com Premium is published at $29 per user/month billed annually with included GitLab Credits; Ultimate is listed on about.gitlab.com/pricing without a public dollar amount (sales/credits). Confirm current Duo add-on prices with GitLab. | Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/remediate/duo/ | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.gitlab.com/user/application_security/vulnerabilities/ | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution and ZeroPath?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, remediation. GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution-only tasks: vulnerability-management. ZeroPath-only tasks: pr-review, sca. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution: Requires GitLab Ultimate and a GitLab Duo add-on (Duo Enterprise or Duo with Amazon Q per docs). GitLab.com Premium is published at $29 per user/month billed annually with included GitLab Credits; Ultimate is listed on about.gitlab.com/pricing without a public dollar amount (sales/credits). Confirm current Duo add-on prices with GitLab. ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix): Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%.
Where are GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution and ZeroPath headquartered?
GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution publishes HQ in United States. ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution or ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution alternatives
- ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
- Checkmarx One Assist vs GitLab Duo Vulnerability Resolution
More ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)