Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent vs ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents
Quick answer
Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent (Google Cloud) and ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents) (ManageEngine (Zoho Corporation)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent (Google Cloud) and ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents) (ManageEngine (Zoho Corporation)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent |  ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Google Cloud | ManageEngine (Zoho Corporation) |
| HQ | United States · North America | India · India |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | AI agent in Google Security Operations that autonomously investigates SIEM alerts and returns a verdict, confidence score, timeline and next steps. | AI agents inside ManageEngine's Log360 Cloud SIEM: an Investigation Agent that runs multi-stage alert investigations and writes an investigation report, prebuilt Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents, and a no-code Agent Studio for custom SOC agents. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | security operations, alert triage, incident response, threat detection | security operations, alert triage, case investigation, threat detection, incident response |
| Pricing (as published) | No standalone list price. Agent usage is metered in Google SecOps Security Tokens. Google's docs describe complimentary daily tokens for some Enterprise Plus customers and token purchases for Enterprise customers. Token prices are not published. | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://docs.cloud.google.com/chronicle/docs/secops/triage-investigation-agent | https://www.manageengine.com/log-management/ai-security/ai-agents-for-security-operations.html |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.cloud.google.com/chronicle/docs/secops/triage-investigation-agent | https://www.manageengine.com/log-management/ai-security/ai-agents-for-security-operations.html |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent and ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, incident-response, threat-detection. Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent-only tasks: none. ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents-only tasks: case-investigation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent: No standalone list price. Agent usage is metered in Google SecOps Security Tokens. Google's docs describe complimentary daily tokens for some Enterprise Plus customers and token purchases for Enterprise customers. Token prices are not published. ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents): Not published
Where are Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent and ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents headquartered?
Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent publishes HQ in United States. ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents) publishes HQ in India.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent or ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) — Configurable AI agents in London-based Napier AI's Continuum financial-crime platform. In Client Screening and Transaction Screening, compliance teams build and tailor 'responsible agents' in a no-code sandbox and choose how much autonomy to hand over, from flagging sanctions, PEP and adverse-media matches for review to clearing known patterns automatically before they reach a queue, with every agent action explained and captured in the audit trail.
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
- Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
Related
- Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent alternatives
- ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent comparisons
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent
More ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents (Investigation, Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents)