Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) vs Intruder AI Pentesting
Quick answer
Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) (Horizon3.ai) and Intruder AI Pentesting (Intruder) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) (Horizon3.ai) and Intruder AI Pentesting (Intruder) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) |  Intruder AI Pentesting |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Horizon3.ai | Intruder |
| HQ | United States · North America | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Autonomous pentesting platform that runs unlimited self-directed internal, external, cloud, Kubernetes and AD pentests, plans attack paths, guides remediation and re-tests to verify fixes. | On-demand, code-aware web-app pentesting by AI agents built by Intruder's CREST-certified testers, with audit-ready reports in hours and issue-level 'micro pentests' to triage scanner findings. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, vulnerability management | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | AI web-app pentests start from $3,500 per test; the scanning platform has a free-forever plan and paid monthly/annual tiers (intruder.io/pricing). |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://horizon3.ai/nodezero/ | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://horizon3.ai/nodezero/ | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Horizon3.ai NodeZero and Intruder AI Pentesting?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: pen-test-management, vulnerability-management. Horizon3.ai NodeZero-only tasks: attack-surface, exposure-management. Intruder AI Pentesting-only tasks: appsec. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting): Not published Intruder AI Pentesting: AI web-app pentests start from $3,500 per test; the scanning platform has a free-forever plan and paid monthly/annual tiers (intruder.io/pricing).
Where are Horizon3.ai NodeZero and Intruder AI Pentesting headquartered?
Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) publishes HQ in United States. Intruder AI Pentesting publishes HQ in United Kingdom.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) or Intruder AI Pentesting. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) alternatives
- Intruder AI Pentesting alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)
More Intruder AI Pentesting comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Intruder AI Pentesting