Horizon3.ai NodeZero vs Phished AI security agents

Quick answer

Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) (Horizon3.ai) and Phished AI security agents (Report Triage, Orchestration, Simulation and Real-Time Protection agents) (Phished) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) (Horizon3.ai) and Phished AI security agents (Report Triage, Orchestration, Simulation and Real-Time Protection agents) (Phished) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting)Phished AI security agents (Report Triage, Orchestration, Simulation and Real-Time Protection agents)
Vendor Horizon3.aiPhished
HQ United States · North AmericaBelgium · Europe
Primary category SecuritySecurity
Also listed in SecuritySecurity
Summary Autonomous pentesting platform that runs unlimited self-directed internal, external, cloud, Kubernetes and AD pentests, plans attack paths, guides remediation and re-tests to verify fixes.Belgian human-risk platform with a suite of AI agents that run the phishing training programme (orchestration, simulation, brand, supplier and deepfake simulation agents), triage every reported email with a verdict and a drafted reply, and check clicked links in an isolated environment in real time. New content needs admin approval and every action is logged.
Frameworks (vendor-stated) ——
Frameworks (vendor-claimed) FedRAMP—
Capabilities / tasks pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, vulnerability managementphishing triage, email security, workflow automation, risk assessment, incident response
Pricing (as published) Not publishedNot published (Core, Advanced and higher tiers listed without visible prices; partner pricing available)
Pricing model quotequote
Primary source https://horizon3.ai/nodezero/https://phished.io/ai-security-agents/
Last checked 2026-10-182026-10-18
Official site https://horizon3.ai/nodezero/https://phished.io/ai-security-agents/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Horizon3.ai NodeZero and Phished AI security agents?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Horizon3.ai NodeZero-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, vulnerability-management. Phished AI security agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, workflow-automation, risk-assessment, incident-response. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting): Not published Phished AI security agents (Report Triage, Orchestration, Simulation and Real-Time Protection agents): Not published (Core, Advanced and higher tiers listed without visible prices; partner pricing available)

Where are Horizon3.ai NodeZero and Phished AI security agents headquartered?

Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) publishes HQ in United States. Phished AI security agents (Report Triage, Orchestration, Simulation and Real-Time Protection agents) publishes HQ in Belgium.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) or Phished AI security agents (Report Triage, Orchestration, Simulation and Real-Time Protection agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Use-case comparisons

Related

More Horizon3.ai NodeZero (autonomous pentesting) comparisons

More Phished AI security agents (Report Triage, Orchestration, Simulation and Real-Time Protection agents) comparisons