Hoxhunt Respond vs noze CyberAgent

Print / Save PDF

Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) (Hoxhunt) and noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)	noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
Vendor	Hoxhunt	noze (noze S.r.l.)
HQ	Finland · Europe	Italy · Europe
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security, Compliance
Summary	Finnish human-risk platform whose Respond module automatically investigates every employee-reported email, groups related reports into one campaign incident, suppresses safe and duplicate reports, and removes confirmed malicious messages from all affected inboxes without waiting for an analyst.	Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001
Capabilities / tasks	phishing triage, email security, incident response, remediation	attack surface, vulnerability management, pen test management, risk prioritization, evidence collection
Pricing (as published)	Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call)	From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published.
Pricing model	quote	published-tiers
Primary source	https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation	https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-21
Official site	https://hoxhunt.com/product/phishing-email-incident-response-automation	https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Hoxhunt Respond and noze CyberAgent?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Hoxhunt Respond-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, incident-response, remediation. noze CyberAgent-only tasks: attack-surface, vulnerability-management, pen-test-management, risk-prioritization, evidence-collection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response): Not published (per-employee quote after a scoping call) noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence): From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published.

Where are Hoxhunt Respond and noze CyberAgent headquartered?

Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) publishes HQ in Finland. noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) publishes HQ in Italy.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) or noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.

Use-case comparisons

• Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

Related

• Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) alternatives
• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) alternatives
• Best security AI agents

More Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Hoxhunt Respond (automated phishing incident response)

More noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)