LogicGate Risk Cloud vs Uptiq compliance and risk agents
Quick answer
LogicGate Risk Cloud (LogicGate) and Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks) (Uptiq (UPTIQ, Inc.)) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
LogicGate Risk Cloud (LogicGate) and Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks) (Uptiq (UPTIQ, Inc.)) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only LogicGate Risk Cloud is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA.
| Field |  LogicGate Risk Cloud |  Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | LogicGate | Uptiq (UPTIQ, Inc.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Risk | Risk |
| Also listed in | Risk, Compliance | Risk, Compliance |
| Summary | AI GRC platform (Risk Cloud) with GRC Agents that act under human supervision for third-party risk, AI governance, enterprise risk and business continuity. | Agents for bank and credit-union compliance teams on Uptiq's Qore platform. A Sanctions Screening Agent screens every transaction and party and prioritises alerts by risk, a BSA/AML Agent assembles case files and drafts SAR and CTR narratives for disposition, and a Regulatory Reporting Agent prepares and validates filings and tracks regulatory changes to policy; agents run under the institution's own policies, permissions and approval gates, with every action logged. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, HIPAA | NIST AI RMF |
| Capabilities / tasks | risk management, compliance workflows, vendor risk, ai governance | aml, alert triage, case investigation, sar narratives, workflow automation |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based. AI Skills are included with every Risk Cloud subscription; GRC Agents are an optional paid add-on priced at a flat fee per year based on organisation size, with a fair-usage limit on yearly agent executions (amounts not published). | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.logicgate.com/ | https://www.uptiq.ai/compliance-risk-solution |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-21 |
| Official site | https://www.logicgate.com/ | https://www.uptiq.ai/compliance-risk-solution |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between LogicGate Risk Cloud and Uptiq compliance and risk agents?
Both are listed under Risk. They share no task tags in this dataset. LogicGate Risk Cloud-only tasks: risk-management, compliance-workflows, vendor-risk, ai-governance. Uptiq compliance and risk agents-only tasks: aml, alert-triage, case-investigation, sar-narratives, workflow-automation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
LogicGate Risk Cloud: Quote-based. AI Skills are included with every Risk Cloud subscription; GRC Agents are an optional paid add-on priced at a flat fee per year based on organisation size, with a fair-usage limit on yearly agent executions (amounts not published). Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks): Not published
Where are LogicGate Risk Cloud and Uptiq compliance and risk agents headquartered?
LogicGate Risk Cloud publishes HQ in United States. Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with LogicGate Risk Cloud or Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages. · Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) pair comparison
- Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) — Configurable AI agents in London-based Napier AI's Continuum financial-crime platform. In Client Screening and Transaction Screening, compliance teams build and tailor 'responsible agents' in a no-code sandbox and choose how much autonomy to hand over, from flagging sanctions, PEP and adverse-media matches for review to clearing known patterns automatically before they reach a queue, with every agent action explained and captured in the audit trail. · Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
- Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) — Agentic AI inside Trulioo's KYB verification workflow from Vancouver-headquartered Trulioo. When registries run out, the UBO Discovery Agent researches filings, disclosures, legal and public records, OSINT and verified third-party databases, reaches registries without API connectivity in real time, reconstructs the beneficial-ownership chain with jurisdiction-specific control logic, cites every finding and reports gaps instead of guessing. · Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AML and transaction-monitoring AI agents — 57 listings (Anti-money-laundering, transaction monitoring and financial-crime investigation)
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- AI governance agents and platforms — 11 listings (AI inventory, risk assessment, policy and runtime controls for AI systems and agents)
Related
- LogicGate Risk Cloud alternatives
- Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks) alternatives
- Best risk AI agents
More LogicGate Risk Cloud comparisons
- BigID (incl. AgentIQ agents) vs LogicGate Risk Cloud
- LogicGate Risk Cloud vs OneTrust
- LogicGate Risk Cloud vs SecurityScorecard
- LogicGate Risk Cloud vs UpGuard
- ACTICO Compliance Solutions AI agents (KI-Agenten for AML, customer and payment screening) vs LogicGate Risk Cloud
More Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks) comparisons
- ACTICO Compliance Solutions AI agents (KI-Agenten for AML, customer and payment screening) vs Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks)
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks)
- BigID (incl. AgentIQ agents) vs Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks)
- Black Kite AI Agent vs Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks)
- Blinqx KYC Agent (Wwft client due diligence and UBO checks for accounting firms) vs Uptiq compliance and risk agents (sanctions screening, BSA/AML and regulatory reporting agents for banks)