Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent vs Torq AI SOC Platform

Quick answer

Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent (Defender) (Microsoft) and Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) (Torq) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent (Defender) (Microsoft) and Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) (Torq) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) is tagged for TX-RAMP.

Columns

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent (Defender)Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents)
Vendor MicrosoftTorq
HQ United States · North AmericaIsrael · Middle East
Primary category SecuritySecurity
Also listed in SecuritySecurity
Summary Security Copilot agent in Microsoft Defender that autonomously triages user-reported phishing, resolves false positives and explains each verdict.Agentic SOC platform where the Socrates orchestrator plans and delegates to specialised HyperAgents for alert triage, investigation and response automation.
Frameworks (vendor-stated) —TX-RAMP
Frameworks (vendor-claimed) ——
Capabilities / tasks phishing triage, email security, security operations, alert triage, incident response, threat detectionsecurity operations, alert triage, incident response, workflow automation
Pricing (as published) No standalone price. Requires Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Plan 2 plus Security Copilot security compute units (SCUs). Microsoft says Security Copilot agents are also made available to Microsoft 365 E5 customers. Check Microsoft's Security Copilot pricing for SCU rates.Not published
Pricing model quotequote
Primary source https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-xdr/phishing-triage-agenthttps://torq.io/socrates/
Last checked 2026-10-182026-10-18
Official site https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-xdr/phishing-triage-agenthttps://torq.io/socrates/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent and Torq AI SOC Platform?

Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, incident-response. Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, threat-detection. Torq AI SOC Platform-only tasks: workflow-automation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent (Defender): No standalone price. Requires Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Plan 2 plus Security Copilot security compute units (SCUs). Microsoft says Security Copilot agents are also made available to Microsoft 365 E5 customers. Check Microsoft's Security Copilot pricing for SCU rates. Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents): Not published

Where are Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent and Torq AI SOC Platform headquartered?

Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent (Defender) publishes HQ in United States. Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) publishes HQ in Israel.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent (Defender) or Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Use-case comparisons

Related

More Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent (Defender) comparisons

More Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) comparisons