Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) vs Strike Graph
Quick answer
Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) (Modulos) and Strike Graph (Strike Graph) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) (Modulos) and Strike Graph (Strike Graph) are both listed in the Compliance category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Strike Graph is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA.
| Field |  Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) |  Strike Graph |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Modulos | Strike Graph |
| HQ | Switzerland · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Compliance | Compliance |
| Also listed in | Compliance, Risk | Compliance |
| Summary | AI governance platform whose agents discover AI systems, assess controls against evidence, quantify AI risk in euros and investigate changes on a schedule, while decisions on the record stay with your team. | Compliance platform with published product pricing pages for building and maintaining security certification programs. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001 | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Capabilities / tasks | ai governance, risk assessment, control testing, evidence collection | evidence collection, control mapping |
| Integrations (vendor-listed) | Not recorded in this dataset yet | AWS, Azure, GCP, GitHub, GitLab, Microsoft 365 / Entra, Jira |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Published on vendor pricing page (see source); verify current tiers on strikegraph.com/pricing. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.modulos.ai/modulos-ai-governance-platform/agents | https://www.strikegraph.com/pricing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.modulos.ai/modulos-ai-governance-platform/agents | https://www.strikegraph.com/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Modulos AI governance agents and Strike Graph?
Both are listed under Compliance. Shared tasks: evidence-collection. Modulos AI governance agents-only tasks: ai-governance, risk-assessment, control-testing. Strike Graph-only tasks: control-mapping. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent): Not published Strike Graph: Published on vendor pricing page (see source); verify current tiers on strikegraph.com/pricing.
Where are Modulos AI governance agents and Strike Graph headquartered?
Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) publishes HQ in Switzerland. Strike Graph publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) or Strike Graph. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. · trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI governance agents and platforms — 11 listings (AI inventory, risk assessment, policy and runtime controls for AI systems and agents)
Related
- Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) alternatives
- Strike Graph alternatives
- Best compliance AI agents
More Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent) comparisons
- 6clicks Hailey AI vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)
- Akitra Andromeda AI compliance agents vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)
- Anecdotes Agentic GRC (Agent Library and Agent Studio) vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)
- Archer Evolv AI Operators (Evolv Foundation and Evolv Workplace) vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)
- Athereon LAiKA (AI agent for ISMS, risk and questionnaires) vs Modulos AI governance agents (Scout, Risk Agent, Control Assessment Agent)