noze CyberAgent vs Tenable One
Quick answer
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) and Tenable One (Hexa AI) (Tenable) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) and Tenable One (Hexa AI) (Tenable) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Tenable One (Hexa AI) is tagged for TX-RAMP.
| Field |  noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) |  Tenable One (Hexa AI) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | noze (noze S.r.l.) | Tenable |
| HQ | Italy · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance | Security, Risk |
| Summary | Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. | Exposure management platform with Tenable Hexa AI agentic orchestration for vulnerability triage and remediation workflows. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | TX-RAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | attack surface, vulnerability management, pen test management, risk prioritization, evidence collection | vulnerability management, exposure management, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published. | Not verified |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/ | https://www.tenable.com/products/tenable-one/capabilities/hexa-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/ | https://www.tenable.com/products/tenable-one |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between noze CyberAgent and Tenable One?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: vulnerability-management. noze CyberAgent-only tasks: attack-surface, pen-test-management, risk-prioritization, evidence-collection. Tenable One-only tasks: exposure-management, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence): From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published. Tenable One (Hexa AI): Not published
Where are noze CyberAgent and Tenable One headquartered?
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) publishes HQ in Italy. Tenable One (Hexa AI) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) or Tenable One (Hexa AI). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) alternatives
- Tenable One (Hexa AI) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)