noze CyberAgent vs Torq AI SOC Platform
Quick answer
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) and Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) (Torq) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) and Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) (Torq) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) is tagged for TX-RAMP.
| Field |  noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) |  Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | noze (noze S.r.l.) | Torq |
| HQ | Italy · Europe | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance | Security |
| Summary | Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. | Agentic SOC platform where the Socrates orchestrator plans and delegates to specialised HyperAgents for alert triage, investigation and response automation. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | TX-RAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | attack surface, vulnerability management, pen test management, risk prioritization, evidence collection | security operations, alert triage, incident response, workflow automation |
| Pricing (as published) | From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published. | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/ | https://torq.io/socrates/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/ | https://torq.io/socrates/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between noze CyberAgent and Torq AI SOC Platform?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. noze CyberAgent-only tasks: attack-surface, vulnerability-management, pen-test-management, risk-prioritization, evidence-collection. Torq AI SOC Platform-only tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, incident-response, workflow-automation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence): From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published. Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents): Not published
Where are noze CyberAgent and Torq AI SOC Platform headquartered?
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) publishes HQ in Italy. Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) publishes HQ in Israel.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) or Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
- Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) alternatives
- Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
More Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents) comparisons
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents)
- Dropzone AI SOC Analyst vs Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents)
- KnowBe4 AIDA (AI Defense Agents) vs Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents)
- Orca Security vs Torq AI SOC Platform (Socrates and HyperAgents)