Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
Quick answer
Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) (Phoenix Security) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) (Phoenix Security) and ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) (ZeroPath) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Phoenix Security | ZeroPath |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | UK AI code-security agent platform with reachability-validated scanning, PR scanning, IDE/agent integrations and an agent that writes risk-tiered fix PRs. | AI-native AppSec platform that finds business-logic and auth flaws, validates findings from existing SAST tools, runs PR security reviews and generates one-click patches refined in natural language. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, pr review, remediation | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published for Phoenix Purple specifically. The Phoenix pricing page lists platform plans (Free; Professional £1,495/month; Enterprise on request) but does not say which plan includes Purple. | Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://phoenix.security/phoenix-purple_ai_code_security/ | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://phoenix.security/phoenix-purple_ai_code_security/ | https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Phoenix Purple and ZeroPath?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, sca, pr-review, remediation. Phoenix Purple-only tasks: secrets-detection, iac. ZeroPath-only tasks: none. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security): Not published for Phoenix Purple specifically. The Phoenix pricing page lists platform plans (Free; Professional £1,495/month; Enterprise on request) but does not say which plan includes Purple. ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix): Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%.
Where are Phoenix Purple and ZeroPath headquartered?
Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) or ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) alternatives
- ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)
More ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)