Qodo multi-agent code review vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent
Quick answer
Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) and Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) and Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Qodo multi-agent code review |  Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Qodo (Codium Ltd.) | GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社) |
| HQ | Israel · Middle East | Japan · Asia Pacific |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Agentic pull-request review platform (formerly CodiumAI) that flags bugs, security issues and rule violations with organisational context. A general code reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner. | Japanese security AI agent that continuously finds vulnerabilities with AI-SAST and AI-DAST (including logic, authentication and authorisation flaws), generates fix patches and opens pull requests with unit tests, and runs AI penetration tests that actually attempt intrusion to prove exploitability. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | ISO 27001 (ISMS certification, vendor claim) |
| Capabilities / tasks | pr review, appsec, code quality | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, pen test management, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. | Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ | https://flatt.tech/takumi |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ | https://flatt.tech/takumi |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Qodo multi-agent code review and Takumi byGMO security AI agent?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: pr-review, appsec. Qodo multi-agent code review-only tasks: code-quality. Takumi byGMO security AI agent-only tasks: sast, remediation, pen-test-management, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Qodo multi-agent code review: Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing): Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026).
Where are Qodo multi-agent code review and Takumi byGMO security AI agent headquartered?
Qodo multi-agent code review publishes HQ in Israel. Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) publishes HQ in Japan.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Qodo multi-agent code review or Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Qodo multi-agent code review alternatives
- Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Qodo multi-agent code review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
More Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)