RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) vs UpGuard
Quick answer
RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) (RiskXchange) and UpGuard (UpGuard) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) (RiskXchange) and UpGuard (UpGuard) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) is tagged for DORA. Only UpGuard is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, TX-RAMP.
| Field |  RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) |  UpGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | RiskXchange | UpGuard |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | Australia · Australia and New Zealand |
| Primary category | Risk | Risk |
| Also listed in | Risk, Security | Risk, Security |
| Summary | AI workforce of five lead agents and 27 specialists that runs third-party risk end to end: vendor outreach, onboarding and questionnaire chasing, document assessment, outside-in breach and score monitoring, regulatory gap analysis and remediation, and regulator-ready reporting, with Manual, Assisted or Autonomous mode set per vendor. | Cyber risk and third-party risk management platform with published CRPM pricing page. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | DORA | SOC 2, ISO 27001, TX-RAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | DORA, NIS2, ISO 27001, APRA CPS 230, NIST CSF, Cyber Essentials Plus, SOC 2 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | vendor risk, questionnaire automation, risk assessment, remediation, security ratings | vendor risk, attack surface, security ratings |
| Pricing (as published) | Platform tiers published: Essentials GBP 14,900/year (50 vendors), Professional GBP 31,500/year (150 vendors), Enterprise from GBP 75,000/year; unlimited seats, no setup fee. The pages don't say which tiers include The Agency. | Published on upguard.com/pricing (CRPM platform tiers; verify current figures). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.riskxchange.co/agency | https://www.upguard.com/pricing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.riskxchange.co/agency | https://www.upguard.com/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between RiskXchange The Agency and UpGuard?
Both are listed under Risk. Shared tasks: vendor-risk, security-ratings. RiskXchange The Agency-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, risk-assessment, remediation. UpGuard-only tasks: attack-surface. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk): Platform tiers published: Essentials GBP 14,900/year (50 vendors), Professional GBP 31,500/year (150 vendors), Enterprise from GBP 75,000/year; unlimited seats, no setup fee. The pages don't say which tiers include The Agency. UpGuard: Published on upguard.com/pricing (CRPM platform tiers; verify current figures).
Where are RiskXchange The Agency and UpGuard headquartered?
RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. UpGuard publishes HQ in Australia.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) or UpGuard. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages. · Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) alternatives
- UpGuard alternatives
- Best risk AI agents
More RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk) comparisons
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)
- Crest TPRM AI agents (Vendor Outreach, Questionnaire Intelligence, Continuous Monitoring, Risk-Based Scoring, Finance, Screening and Efficiency agents) vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)
- ProcessUnity TPRM AI Agents (Evidence Evaluator, Assessment Autofill) vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)
- Rescana autonomous TPRM agents (Discovery & Classification, Risk Assessment, Communication & Remediation and Manager agents) vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)
- ACTICO Compliance Solutions AI agents (KI-Agenten for AML, customer and payment screening) vs RiskXchange The Agency (32 AI agents for third-party risk)