Takumi byGMO security AI agent vs Tembo
Quick answer
Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) and Tembo (Tembo Data Systems) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) and Tembo (Tembo Data Systems) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社) | Tembo Data Systems |
| HQ | Japan · Asia Pacific | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Business operations |
| Summary | Japanese security AI agent that continuously finds vulnerabilities with AI-SAST and AI-DAST (including logic, authentication and authorisation flaws), generates fix patches and opens pull requests with unit tests, and runs AI penetration tests that actually attempt intrusion to prove exploitability. | Agent orchestration platform (not a dedicated AppSec scanner) that opens auto-fix PRs from Snyk vulnerability scans and Sentry production errors. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | ISO 27001 (ISMS certification, vendor claim) | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, pen test management, vulnerability management | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026). | Published on tembo.io/pricing: free trial; Pro $60/month ($60 usage allowance, up to 5 users); Max $200/month (up to 10 users); Enterprise custom. Usage allowance covers Tembo Gateway tokens and cloud VM compute; overages optional on paid plans. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://flatt.tech/takumi | https://docs.tembo.io/integrations/snyk |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://flatt.tech/takumi | https://www.tembo.io/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Takumi byGMO security AI agent and Tembo?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: remediation. Takumi byGMO security AI agent-only tasks: appsec, sast, pr-review, pen-test-management, vulnerability-management. Tembo-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations, sca. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing): Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026). Tembo: Published on tembo.io/pricing: free trial; Pro $60/month ($60 usage allowance, up to 5 users); Max $200/month (up to 10 users); Enterprise custom. Usage allowance covers Tembo Gateway tokens and cloud VM compute; overages optional on paid plans.
Where are Takumi byGMO security AI agent and Tembo headquartered?
Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) publishes HQ in Japan. Tembo publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) alternatives
- Tembo alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)
More Tembo comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Tembo
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Tembo
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Tembo
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Tembo
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Tembo