Takumi byGMO security AI agent vs Tembo

Quick answer

Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) and Tembo (Tembo Data Systems) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) (GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)) and Tembo (Tembo Data Systems) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)Tembo
Vendor GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)Tembo Data Systems
HQ Japan · Asia PacificUnited States · North America
Primary category Code securityCode security
Also listed in Code security, SecurityCode security, Business operations
Summary Japanese security AI agent that continuously finds vulnerabilities with AI-SAST and AI-DAST (including logic, authentication and authorisation flaws), generates fix patches and opens pull requests with unit tests, and runs AI penetration tests that actually attempt intrusion to prove exploitability.Agent orchestration platform (not a dedicated AppSec scanner) that opens auto-fix PRs from Snyk vulnerability scans and Sentry production errors.
Frameworks (vendor-stated) ——
Frameworks (vendor-claimed) ISO 27001 (ISMS certification, vendor claim)—
Capabilities / tasks appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, pen test management, vulnerability managementagent platform with security integrations, remediation, sca
Pricing (as published) Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026).Published on tembo.io/pricing: free trial; Pro $60/month ($60 usage allowance, up to 5 users); Max $200/month (up to 10 users); Enterprise custom. Usage allowance covers Tembo Gateway tokens and cloud VM compute; overages optional on paid plans.
Pricing model published-tierspublished-tiers
Primary source https://flatt.tech/takumihttps://docs.tembo.io/integrations/snyk
Last checked 2026-10-202026-10-18
Official site https://flatt.tech/takumihttps://www.tembo.io/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Takumi byGMO security AI agent and Tembo?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: remediation. Takumi byGMO security AI agent-only tasks: appsec, sast, pr-review, pen-test-management, vulnerability-management. Tembo-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations, sca. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing): Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026). Tembo: Published on tembo.io/pricing: free trial; Pro $60/month ($60 usage allowance, up to 5 users); Max $200/month (up to 10 users); Enterprise custom. Usage allowance covers Tembo Gateway tokens and cloud VM compute; overages optional on paid plans.

Where are Takumi byGMO security AI agent and Tembo headquartered?

Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) publishes HQ in Japan. Tembo publishes HQ in United States.

Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Use-case comparisons

Related

More Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) comparisons

More Tembo comparisons