Wiz vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
Quick answer
Wiz (Wiz) and YesWeHack Agentic Pentest (YesWeHack) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Wiz (Wiz) and YesWeHack Agentic Pentest (YesWeHack) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Wiz is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, TX-RAMP.
| Field |  Wiz |  YesWeHack Agentic Pentest |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Wiz | YesWeHack |
| HQ | United States · North America | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Risk | Security |
| Summary | Cloud security / CNAPP platform with agentless visibility, risk prioritization and security graph across cloud environments. | On-demand pentests of external attack surface run by AI agents shaped by YesWeHack's bug-hunting expertise, with dedicated verification agents, a Pentest Manager, same-day results and reports in its vulnerability-management platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP, TX-RAMP | — |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | Wiz for U.S. Government · FedRAMP Authorized · FR2308034636A · High · authorized 2025-09-25 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | cloud security, vulnerability management, risk prioritization | pen test management, attack surface, appsec, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Custom quote (wiz.io/pricing). | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.wiz.io/pricing | https://www.yeswehack.com/product/agentic-pentest |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.wiz.io/ | https://www.yeswehack.com/product/agentic-pentest |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Wiz and YesWeHack Agentic Pentest?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: vulnerability-management. Wiz-only tasks: cloud-security, risk-prioritization. YesWeHack Agentic Pentest-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, appsec. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Wiz: Custom quote (wiz.io/pricing). YesWeHack Agentic Pentest: Not published
Where are Wiz and YesWeHack Agentic Pentest headquartered?
Wiz publishes HQ in United States. YesWeHack Agentic Pentest publishes HQ in France.
Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Wiz or YesWeHack Agentic Pentest. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
- Cloud security (CNAPP) AI agents — 9 listings (Cloud and container security posture, exposure and remediation)
Related
More Wiz comparisons
- Wiz vs Orca Security
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Wiz
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Wiz
- Conveyor vs Wiz
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Wiz
More YesWeHack Agentic Pentest comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest