Cursor Bugbot

What it does

Bugbot is Cursor’s automated PR review product. Cursor docs state that it analyses PR diffs, leaves comments with explanations and fix suggestions, can run on each PR update or on a manual trigger (cursor review / bugbot run), and supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and Origin after the repository is connected. Findings can include security issues; this is a general PR reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner. Cursor documents CI check statuses, optional fail-on-unresolved-issues, .cursor/BUGBOT.md rules, and a Bugbot API for enterprise teams. Vendor-claimed accuracy figures (for example that more than half of reported bugs are eventually fixed by engineers) are as marketed on cursor.com/bugbot.

Frameworks (vendor-stated)

No framework tags yet.

Pricing (as published)

Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team.

India relevance

PR review that flags security issues can support secure SDLC programmes. Cursor does not market a CERT-In module.

Tasks

pr reviewappsecremediation

Sources

1. cursor.com/docs/bugbot (primary)
2. cursor.com/bugbot
3. cursor.com/help/ai-features/bugbot.md
4. cursor.com/terms-of-service

Last verified 18 Oct 2026. Framework tags indicate relevance, not certification; “vendor-claimed” items are as marketed by the vendor. Spotted an error? Submit a correction or email [email protected]. See our methodology.

Use-case comparisons

• AI code security agents — 33 verified listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)

Compare Cursor Bugbot with

• 
  Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cursor Bugbot
• 
  AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Cursor Bugbot
• 
  Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Cursor Bugbot
• 
  Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Cursor Bugbot
• 
  Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Cursor Bugbot
• 
  Checkmarx One Assist vs Cursor Bugbot
• 
  Claude Code security review vs Cursor Bugbot
• 
  Codacy AI Reviewer vs Cursor Bugbot
• 
  Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) vs Cursor Bugbot
• 
  Cursor Bugbot vs CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)

Alternatives

• 
  Aikido AI AutoFix — Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ.
• 
  AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) — Prague-headquartered AI code-security platform in which thousands of agents analyse a codebase in parallel for exploitable vulnerabilities, fix agents write patches, and agentic verification builds the repo and runs tests before opening a pull request for human merge. October 2026 added agent-driven proof of exploitability against running web apps and APIs. Cohere signed a letter of intent to acquire AISLE on Oct 15, 2026.
• 
  Amazon Q Developer security scanning — Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes.
• 
  Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
• 
  Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) — Agentic AI application security tool (GA March 2026) with role- and task-based agents that analyse new code in any language, filter findings by exploitability and apply verified fixes, callable from Claude Code, Gemini and GitHub Copilot via MCP.
• 
  Checkmarx One Assist — Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel.

See all Cursor Bugbot alternatives →

FAQ (from this dataset)

What does Cursor Bugbot do?

Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.

How much does Cursor Bugbot cost?

Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team.

Where is Anysphere headquartered?

United States

What are alternatives to Cursor Bugbot?

See the Cursor Bugbot alternatives page for category-sharing listings in relevance order, not a ranking. Cursor Bugbot alternatives.

Stay updated